@jns83933 years agoMorality can discussed in school without making declarations of what is right or wrong. It's the thought processes and critical thinking that needs to be taught. 17
@
@MG-ot2yr3 years agoThere was a study that found kids raised in non-religious households were more altruistic than kids raised with religion. 5
@
@Steve-hu9gw3 years agoOkay, former teacher here. Note the correct answer: A school is a mini society. No school, as no society, can function without the promulgation and maintenance of certain basic ethical standards and goals. Without some basic notions of honoring and respecting human worth and dignity, any society or school quickly devolves into an orgy of unrestrained violence and chaos. Trust me. Even with some basic ethical standards, more days than not … . I speak from experience. To fantasize that teachers can leave all this to parents and guardians at home is precisely that, to fantasize in some la-la land existing solely in one’s own mind. The fact is that, during the school year, children spend most of their waking hours at school. Most of their ethical conflicts will occur at school. Most of their physical and emotional conflicts will occur at school. They must all be dealt with at school. There is no escaping the fact that teachers and administrators will in fact be inculcating and enforcing ethical standards at school. The only question is whether they will do so openly and directly, and whether any kind of course will be set up to address it. I don’t think courses are at all required, but the open discussion, inculcation, and enforcement of basic ethics is very helpful. Just stick to basic more-or-less interpersonal ethics and leave anything specifically religious out of it, to the extent possible. Yes, I was triggered. ...6
@
@bidragandeorsak3 years agoMoral is the practice of ethics. Ethics is the theory of moral. As a Swede, for me it has no religious conotations. Also, working with kids, you can NOT teach moral. It is in all we are and how we relate to each other. ...4
@
@stephenland93613 years agoI do recall being taught a smattering of morality in school. However, I think I learned far more about morality by simply interacting with all the other kids, especially on the playground. It was a long process. 1
@
@tommystyx3 years agoMorality is not a class in school it's something you are constantly learning all your life and part of that takes place in school.
@
@blueredingreen10 months agoMorality is learnt by just interacting with others. But it would help to give people formal frameworks so their morality isn't just what they personally feel is right, based on their upbringing (because that's how bad ideas stick around for generations), but that they have some tools to question this (which also helps prevent bad ideas from spreading). This is also part of critical thinking and skepticism, part of questioning why you do what you do, feel what you feel, believe what you believe, and do what you do. Learning that, I would argue, is much more important than formally being taught morality. ...
@
@artistjoh3 years agoTheists are so blinkered that they automatically assume that the morality they mean is their personal interpretation of their god. As soon as you say “I agree, and I think we should implement the morality of Thor and the Halls of Valhalla immediately” they think that is silly, and they cannot understand that the morality of their god is just as silly. ...4
@
@JesusUnfollower3 years agoTotally agree. Epistemology should be taught in schools. 2
@
@chainclaw073 years agoThis was a good call and distinction ethics vs morality. Also if a theist advocates for their theistic morals being taught just ask if another theistic moral should be taught instead and how do we reconcile that? By presenting and teaching ethics that are demonstrable and can be agreed upon. And not pointing to a faithbased idea because what if I have another faith? ...1
@
@duncanbryson11673 years agoHow about changing the word to ethics? 1
@
@stephenjackson77972 years agoTeach ethics, it is more formal and more definable.
@
@happymaskedguy19433 years agoMorality for me is a question of 'ought to' - it has a rigid, inflexible quality, while at the same time being extremely nebulous (probably why so many theists latch onto it). As Jim says, the teaching of ethics via epistemology is a much better model, as the fluidity of a question is framed only by its individual or interacting circumstances. It doesn't rely on someone arbitrarily assigning a broad solution based on 'ought to' ideology. More often than not there is no 'right' answer, which is something theists simply will not tolerate. Uncertainty for them is not an option. ...
@
@Germatti134893 years agoYou can teach a child right and wrong by reading stories then discussing what should have been done. They should also go back to teaching kids how to cook, take care of a checkbook/bank statement, and shop. I cut the tip of my finger in shop class but I learned a valuable lesson. 👵 ...1
@
@mjallen13083 years agoI don’t see why morality can’t be discussed in line with other thought experiments as well as a stand-alone topic related to how to treat ppl that is beneficial to the health and well-being of society even though that doesn’t preclude discussion of selfishness which is not inherently wrong. ...
@
@loodlebop3 years agoPretty sure morality is taught in school already on a basic level
@
@lukewojtanowicz19913 years agoKids do learn morality in school, usually from interaction with other kids. 3
@
@rageofheaven3 years agoNo, we have a hard enough time teaching kids how to read as it is.
@
@hdub80933 years agoMorality should be taught, yes, but from which perspective? what if it conflicts with the morality kids are being taught at home?... if it's basic morality then it may have a point being taught in schools. Secular ethics miay be a better subject to teach ...
@
@Ablestreet3 years agoYou have to first define morality. If you are thinking of using a religious text as the source of morality teaching then the answer is hell no!! 1
@
@Comrade_Tokoloshe3 years agoMorality should be taught by example at home.
@
@Schyla43 years agoFor me, since morality is subjective, it would really depend on what we are teaching. We would all have to be in agreement on what we want our kids to be taught. I think most of us could agree on easy topics like murder, but what about moral topics that many people don't agree on? And then the real question is can you even teach morality? Could you teach someone that it's morally wrong to abandon children or is that something they develop themselves to be wrong as they grow older? How would you teach them about morality on subjects like abortion? The answer is obvious for some of us but not obvious for others. I think that because it is subjective that we really can't teach it without there being issues and agreeance on what we're teaching. It would be extremely controversial ...
@
@exiled_londoner3 years agoMorality is subjective and contested and any state (or private) education system that tries to 'teach' morality is basically engaging in indoctrination. Teaching kids about how civil society works, basic ethics, epistemology, and mutual respect for oneself and other people is not the same as 'morality' (although there may be some overlap) and it is obvious that the USA suffers greatly from the inability or unwillingness of your education system to deal with these issues - instead you teach them mindless obedience and nationalistic 'patriotism' by getting them to fetishise the national flag and swear oaths of allegiance to a piece of cloth. ...
@
@stevesavage42473 years agoTeaching consent would be good... wouldn't want to be the person trying to develop that course though
@
@jns83933 years agoMorality can discussed in school without making declarations of what is right or wrong. It's the thought processes and critical thinking that needs to be taught. 17
@
@MG-ot2yr3 years agoThere was a study that found kids raised in non-religious households were more altruistic than kids raised with religion. 5
@
@Steve-hu9gw3 years agoOkay, former teacher here. Note the correct answer: A school is a mini society. No school, as no society, can function without the promulgation and maintenance of certain basic ethical standards and goals. Without some basic notions of honoring and respecting human worth and dignity, any society or school quickly devolves into an orgy of unrestrained violence and chaos. Trust me. Even with some basic ethical standards, more days than not … . I speak from experience. To fantasize that teachers can leave all this to parents and guardians at home is precisely that, to fantasize in some la-la land existing solely in one’s own mind. The fact is that, during the school year, children spend most of their waking hours at school. Most of their ethical conflicts will occur at school. Most of their physical and emotional conflicts will occur at school. They must all be dealt with at school. There is no escaping the fact that teachers and administrators will in fact be inculcating and enforcing ethical standards at school. The only question is whether they will do so openly and directly, and whether any kind of course will be set up to address it. I don’t think courses are at all required, but the open discussion, inculcation, and enforcement of basic ethics is very helpful. Just stick to basic more-or-less interpersonal ethics and leave anything specifically religious out of it, to the extent possible. Yes, I was triggered. ...6
@
@bidragandeorsak3 years agoMoral is the practice of ethics. Ethics is the theory of moral. As a Swede, for me it has no religious conotations. Also, working with kids, you can NOT teach moral. It is in all we are and how we relate to each other. ...4
@
@stephenland93613 years agoI do recall being taught a smattering of morality in school. However, I think I learned far more about morality by simply interacting with all the other kids, especially on the playground. It was a long process. 1
@
@tommystyx3 years agoMorality is not a class in school it's something you are constantly learning all your life and part of that takes place in school.
@
@blueredingreen10 months agoMorality is learnt by just interacting with others. But it would help to give people formal frameworks so their morality isn't just what they personally feel is right, based on their upbringing (because that's how bad ideas stick around for generations), but that they have some tools to question this (which also helps prevent bad ideas from spreading). This is also part of critical thinking and skepticism, part of questioning why you do what you do, feel what you feel, believe what you believe, and do what you do. Learning that, I would argue, is much more important than formally being taught morality. ...
@
@artistjoh3 years agoTheists are so blinkered that they automatically assume that the morality they mean is their personal interpretation of their god. As soon as you say “I agree, and I think we should implement the morality of Thor and the Halls of Valhalla immediately” they think that is silly, and they cannot understand that the morality of their god is just as silly. ...4
@
@JesusUnfollower3 years agoTotally agree. Epistemology should be taught in schools. 2
@
@chainclaw073 years agoThis was a good call and distinction ethics vs morality. Also if a theist advocates for their theistic morals being taught just ask if another theistic moral should be taught instead and how do we reconcile that? By presenting and teaching ethics that are demonstrable and can be agreed upon. And not pointing to a faithbased idea because what if I have another faith? ...1
@
@duncanbryson11673 years agoHow about changing the word to ethics? 1
@
@stephenjackson77972 years agoTeach ethics, it is more formal and more definable.
@
@happymaskedguy19433 years agoMorality for me is a question of 'ought to' - it has a rigid, inflexible quality, while at the same time being extremely nebulous (probably why so many theists latch onto it). As Jim says, the teaching of ethics via epistemology is a much better model, as the fluidity of a question is framed only by its individual or interacting circumstances. It doesn't rely on someone arbitrarily assigning a broad solution based on 'ought to' ideology. More often than not there is no 'right' answer, which is something theists simply will not tolerate. Uncertainty for them is not an option. ...
@
@Germatti134893 years agoYou can teach a child right and wrong by reading stories then discussing what should have been done. They should also go back to teaching kids how to cook, take care of a checkbook/bank statement, and shop. I cut the tip of my finger in shop class but I learned a valuable lesson. 👵 ...1
@
@mjallen13083 years agoI don’t see why morality can’t be discussed in line with other thought experiments as well as a stand-alone topic related to how to treat ppl that is beneficial to the health and well-being of society even though that doesn’t preclude discussion of selfishness which is not inherently wrong. ...
@
@loodlebop3 years agoPretty sure morality is taught in school already on a basic level
@
@lukewojtanowicz19913 years agoKids do learn morality in school, usually from interaction with other kids. 3
@
@rageofheaven3 years agoNo, we have a hard enough time teaching kids how to read as it is.
@
@hdub80933 years agoMorality should be taught, yes, but from which perspective? what if it conflicts with the morality kids are being taught at home?... if it's basic morality then it may have a point being taught in schools. Secular ethics miay be a better subject to teach ...
@
@Ablestreet3 years agoYou have to first define morality. If you are thinking of using a religious text as the source of morality teaching then the answer is hell no!! 1
@
@Comrade_Tokoloshe3 years agoMorality should be taught by example at home.
@
@Schyla43 years agoFor me, since morality is subjective, it would really depend on what we are teaching. We would all have to be in agreement on what we want our kids to be taught. I think most of us could agree on easy topics like murder, but what about moral topics that many people don't agree on? And then the real question is can you even teach morality? Could you teach someone that it's morally wrong to abandon children or is that something they develop themselves to be wrong as they grow older? How would you teach them about morality on subjects like abortion? The answer is obvious for some of us but not obvious for others. I think that because it is subjective that we really can't teach it without there being issues and agreeance on what we're teaching. It would be extremely controversial ...
@
@exiled_londoner3 years agoMorality is subjective and contested and any state (or private) education system that tries to 'teach' morality is basically engaging in indoctrination. Teaching kids about how civil society works, basic ethics, epistemology, and mutual respect for oneself and other people is not the same as 'morality' (although there may be some overlap) and it is obvious that the USA suffers greatly from the inability or unwillingness of your education system to deal with these issues - instead you teach them mindless obedience and nationalistic 'patriotism' by getting them to fetishise the national flag and swear oaths of allegiance to a piece of cloth. ...
@
@stevesavage42473 years agoTeaching consent would be good... wouldn't want to be the person trying to develop that course though
Related videos for Teaching Morality In Schools | Anton-MD | The Atheist Experience 25.11:
A school is a mini society. No school, as no society, can function without the promulgation and maintenance of certain basic ethical standards and goals. Without some basic notions of honoring and respecting human worth and dignity, any society or school quickly devolves into an orgy of unrestrained violence and chaos. Trust me. Even with some basic ethical standards, more days than not … . I speak from experience. To fantasize that teachers can leave all this to parents and guardians at home is precisely that, to fantasize in some la-la land existing solely in one’s own mind. The fact is that, during the school year, children spend most of their waking hours at school. Most of their ethical conflicts will occur at school. Most of their physical and emotional conflicts will occur at school. They must all be dealt with at school. There is no escaping the fact that teachers and administrators will in fact be inculcating and enforcing ethical standards at school. The only question is whether they will do so openly and directly, and whether any kind of course will be set up to address it. I don’t think courses are at all required, but the open discussion, inculcation, and enforcement of basic ethics is very helpful. Just stick to basic more-or-less interpersonal ethics and leave anything specifically religious out of it, to the extent possible.
Yes, I was triggered. ... 6
As a Swede, for me it has no religious conotations.
Also, working with kids, you can NOT teach moral. It is in all we are and how we relate to each other. ... 4
This is also part of critical thinking and skepticism, part of questioning why you do what you do, feel what you feel, believe what you believe, and do what you do. Learning that, I would argue, is much more important than formally being taught morality. ...
As Jim says, the teaching of ethics via epistemology is a much better model, as the fluidity of a question is framed only by its individual or interacting circumstances. It doesn't rely on someone arbitrarily assigning a broad solution based on 'ought to' ideology.
More often than not there is no 'right' answer, which is something theists simply will not tolerate. Uncertainty for them is not an option. ...
It would be extremely controversial ...
A school is a mini society. No school, as no society, can function without the promulgation and maintenance of certain basic ethical standards and goals. Without some basic notions of honoring and respecting human worth and dignity, any society or school quickly devolves into an orgy of unrestrained violence and chaos. Trust me. Even with some basic ethical standards, more days than not … . I speak from experience. To fantasize that teachers can leave all this to parents and guardians at home is precisely that, to fantasize in some la-la land existing solely in one’s own mind. The fact is that, during the school year, children spend most of their waking hours at school. Most of their ethical conflicts will occur at school. Most of their physical and emotional conflicts will occur at school. They must all be dealt with at school. There is no escaping the fact that teachers and administrators will in fact be inculcating and enforcing ethical standards at school. The only question is whether they will do so openly and directly, and whether any kind of course will be set up to address it. I don’t think courses are at all required, but the open discussion, inculcation, and enforcement of basic ethics is very helpful. Just stick to basic more-or-less interpersonal ethics and leave anything specifically religious out of it, to the extent possible.
Yes, I was triggered. ... 6
As a Swede, for me it has no religious conotations.
Also, working with kids, you can NOT teach moral. It is in all we are and how we relate to each other. ... 4
This is also part of critical thinking and skepticism, part of questioning why you do what you do, feel what you feel, believe what you believe, and do what you do. Learning that, I would argue, is much more important than formally being taught morality. ...
As Jim says, the teaching of ethics via epistemology is a much better model, as the fluidity of a question is framed only by its individual or interacting circumstances. It doesn't rely on someone arbitrarily assigning a broad solution based on 'ought to' ideology.
More often than not there is no 'right' answer, which is something theists simply will not tolerate. Uncertainty for them is not an option. ...
It would be extremely controversial ...